Pryon Appoints AI Veteran Hamsa Buvaraghan as SVP/Head of Product
Google and Microsoft Product Veteran Joins Pryon to Lead Company's Enterprise AI Memory Vision and Strategy

At DevDay last week (October 6th), OpenAI rolled out Agent Builder, a low-code, drag-and-drop canvas that promises to let anyone string together LLM calls, tools, and connectors in minutes using OpenAI’s primitives.
While this is a great tool to reduce time to build and lower technical barriers of entry (which is why Pryon has been building our own orchestration engine), this release fundamentally misunderstands the current state of the GenAI market, and where the pain really lives. It is easier than ever to build beautiful demos of killer apps and agents. The trouble is in taking these impressive looking, but lightweight pilots and having them withstand the weight of production deployment. This is where value is actually realized in an enterprise environment. In 2025, MIT found that 88% of surveyed organizations are piloting GenAI, yet only 5% are deploying to production and finding value. OpenAI’s AgentBuilder will help teams build more of these pilots and prototypes but does not solve the problems causing production deployment failure.
This release from OpenAI will allow developers to build these demos in minutes rather than hours; however, it does not solve the hard problems of GenAI deployment. Organizations are tripping over systems integration, compliance and legal risk, data preparation, accurate trustworthy systems downstream of information retrieval, and ongoing maintenance. This is the unglamourous plumbing that determines whether an app or an agent actually survives production and delivers value.
Here's Pryon's take: Agent Builder looks slick, works like an automated assembly line, and absolutely shortens time-to-demo for GenAI apps, assistants, and agents.
But an assembly line is only as good as the parts it welds together.
If you’re building a car, the paint robots and conveyor belts matter. They will boost throughput and lower the chances of defects. But if you put a cheap carburetor into that gorgeously assembled chassis, the whole vehicle will still sputter the first time you hit the gas.
Assembly Lines are visual workflow builders/orchestrators. There is no shortage of these in the market; they lower the barrier to entry for agent building, removing some (though not all) of the technical fluency needed to build, and they speed up time for development.
Carburetors (fuel systems) are your data ingestion/preparation and information retrieval pipelines. These are what make your systems run in the real world.
Agent Builder gives users a great assembly line. It even bolts on a default ‘carburetor’ in the form of OpenAI file search + Vector DB. For quick prototypes and small-scale deployments, great. For real world RAG, you’ll want performance parts.
Somewhere between 85-95% of AI PoCs are failing in production. The reasons for these failures happen at the component level (and the downstream effects of this).
OpenAI just gave the community a fantastic assembly line. But if the components inside the system are bargain-basement, your shiny new agent will roll out the lot clunky and coughing smoke.
Agents' value will be determined by how they execute for enterprises, not by how efficiently they were built.
Kick the tires of Agent Builder, then come test drive our high-performance Agent stack. We know you‘ll feel the difference the moment you step on the gas.

At DevDay last week (October 6th), OpenAI rolled out Agent Builder, a low-code, drag-and-drop canvas that promises to let anyone string together LLM calls, tools, and connectors in minutes using OpenAI’s primitives.
While this is a great tool to reduce time to build and lower technical barriers of entry (which is why Pryon has been building our own orchestration engine), this release fundamentally misunderstands the current state of the GenAI market, and where the pain really lives. It is easier than ever to build beautiful demos of killer apps and agents. The trouble is in taking these impressive looking, but lightweight pilots and having them withstand the weight of production deployment. This is where value is actually realized in an enterprise environment. In 2025, MIT found that 88% of surveyed organizations are piloting GenAI, yet only 5% are deploying to production and finding value. OpenAI’s AgentBuilder will help teams build more of these pilots and prototypes but does not solve the problems causing production deployment failure.
This release from OpenAI will allow developers to build these demos in minutes rather than hours; however, it does not solve the hard problems of GenAI deployment. Organizations are tripping over systems integration, compliance and legal risk, data preparation, accurate trustworthy systems downstream of information retrieval, and ongoing maintenance. This is the unglamourous plumbing that determines whether an app or an agent actually survives production and delivers value.
Here's Pryon's take: Agent Builder looks slick, works like an automated assembly line, and absolutely shortens time-to-demo for GenAI apps, assistants, and agents.
But an assembly line is only as good as the parts it welds together.
If you’re building a car, the paint robots and conveyor belts matter. They will boost throughput and lower the chances of defects. But if you put a cheap carburetor into that gorgeously assembled chassis, the whole vehicle will still sputter the first time you hit the gas.
Assembly Lines are visual workflow builders/orchestrators. There is no shortage of these in the market; they lower the barrier to entry for agent building, removing some (though not all) of the technical fluency needed to build, and they speed up time for development.
Carburetors (fuel systems) are your data ingestion/preparation and information retrieval pipelines. These are what make your systems run in the real world.
Agent Builder gives users a great assembly line. It even bolts on a default ‘carburetor’ in the form of OpenAI file search + Vector DB. For quick prototypes and small-scale deployments, great. For real world RAG, you’ll want performance parts.
Somewhere between 85-95% of AI PoCs are failing in production. The reasons for these failures happen at the component level (and the downstream effects of this).
OpenAI just gave the community a fantastic assembly line. But if the components inside the system are bargain-basement, your shiny new agent will roll out the lot clunky and coughing smoke.
Agents' value will be determined by how they execute for enterprises, not by how efficiently they were built.
Kick the tires of Agent Builder, then come test drive our high-performance Agent stack. We know you‘ll feel the difference the moment you step on the gas.

At DevDay last week (October 6th), OpenAI rolled out Agent Builder, a low-code, drag-and-drop canvas that promises to let anyone string together LLM calls, tools, and connectors in minutes using OpenAI’s primitives.
While this is a great tool to reduce time to build and lower technical barriers of entry (which is why Pryon has been building our own orchestration engine), this release fundamentally misunderstands the current state of the GenAI market, and where the pain really lives. It is easier than ever to build beautiful demos of killer apps and agents. The trouble is in taking these impressive looking, but lightweight pilots and having them withstand the weight of production deployment. This is where value is actually realized in an enterprise environment. In 2025, MIT found that 88% of surveyed organizations are piloting GenAI, yet only 5% are deploying to production and finding value. OpenAI’s AgentBuilder will help teams build more of these pilots and prototypes but does not solve the problems causing production deployment failure.
This release from OpenAI will allow developers to build these demos in minutes rather than hours; however, it does not solve the hard problems of GenAI deployment. Organizations are tripping over systems integration, compliance and legal risk, data preparation, accurate trustworthy systems downstream of information retrieval, and ongoing maintenance. This is the unglamourous plumbing that determines whether an app or an agent actually survives production and delivers value.
Here's Pryon's take: Agent Builder looks slick, works like an automated assembly line, and absolutely shortens time-to-demo for GenAI apps, assistants, and agents.
But an assembly line is only as good as the parts it welds together.
If you’re building a car, the paint robots and conveyor belts matter. They will boost throughput and lower the chances of defects. But if you put a cheap carburetor into that gorgeously assembled chassis, the whole vehicle will still sputter the first time you hit the gas.
Assembly Lines are visual workflow builders/orchestrators. There is no shortage of these in the market; they lower the barrier to entry for agent building, removing some (though not all) of the technical fluency needed to build, and they speed up time for development.
Carburetors (fuel systems) are your data ingestion/preparation and information retrieval pipelines. These are what make your systems run in the real world.
Agent Builder gives users a great assembly line. It even bolts on a default ‘carburetor’ in the form of OpenAI file search + Vector DB. For quick prototypes and small-scale deployments, great. For real world RAG, you’ll want performance parts.
Somewhere between 85-95% of AI PoCs are failing in production. The reasons for these failures happen at the component level (and the downstream effects of this).
OpenAI just gave the community a fantastic assembly line. But if the components inside the system are bargain-basement, your shiny new agent will roll out the lot clunky and coughing smoke.
Agents' value will be determined by how they execute for enterprises, not by how efficiently they were built.
Kick the tires of Agent Builder, then come test drive our high-performance Agent stack. We know you‘ll feel the difference the moment you step on the gas.